Plan protocols and evaluate pediatric activities
Study pediatric engagement with adaptable activities, plan protocols in a governed workflow and ground your rationale in current field data.
- Question
- What will the study test?
- Design
- Which methods fit the question?
- Sample
- How will sample size be justified?
- Oversight
- Which reviews are required?
Define aims and hypotheses before selecting methods. Keep feasibility outcomes separate from effectiveness claims.
Plan study design, oversight and evaluation
Each stage of the work for academic researchers, with an example milestone and the pathway that supports it.
Research question
Turning a clinical observation into a clear, testable question.
Aims and hypotheses agreed before design.
mtxt.ai structures concept, aims and hypotheses.
Tools for your research tasks
Where each pathway fits your work.
Ways to use the research tools
- Plan the studymtxt.ai
Define a research question
Use a clinical observation about play to draft aims and hypotheses for team review.
- Build and validatePlaySpace for Research
Prepare study activities
Adapt Studio activities for your study population and document the versions used.
- Read the marketIndustry Intelligence
The grant introduction
Current workforce and access data frame why the study matters now.
Before you ask.
Does mtxt.ai replace ethics review?
No. It helps you prepare clearer documentation before review. Your institution’s oversight stays in place.
Can we adapt activities for our study?
Yes. Studio activities can be adapted to your population, and locked so every participant gets the same version.
Is participant data kept separate?
Study data is governed by your protocol and agreements. We’ll walk through data handling with your team.
Other research teams.
Explore study planning and evaluation tools
Research use requires study oversight and validation. mtxt.ai is available on its own website; its PlaySpace integration is coming soon.